Ekman 60 Faces Test Software

May 7, 2015 - One thing you are going to want is a variety of faces that you can use for your system. The database includes a software tool that allows you to export. Each one shows the frontal view of a face of one out of 23 different test persons. Following Ekman's FACS model (and given an emotional label).

Introduction The study of social cognition indicates serial information processing about others’ behaviors or thinking in social situations. Recognition of others’ emotions, understanding of others’ mental state, and attributional orientations in explaining social situations are presented as the three domains of social cognition (e.g., ). Among these social cognitive domains, how well individuals identify and recognize others’ emotions is the most popular research topic, and it reflects human instinctive function (;; ).

Accurate emotional recognition is certainly the prerequisite for development and maintenance of successful social interactions (). If there is a deficit in the ability to identify others’ facial emotions, it causes many interpersonal difficulties such as miscommunication with others and low social competency, and more general difficulties such as lower personal well-being and greater depression (). Therefore, there is great interest among researchers in understanding the mechanisms of and influences on facial emotion recognition (FER) in humans. Basic facial emotions (i.e., anger, fear, disgust, sadness, happiness, and surprise), which humans use to convey emotions, are considered to be innate and cross-cultural (). The classical study by supports the presence of universal roles for FER in social networks.

There are three theories regarding emotion processing, namely, the limbic system model, the right hemisphere model, and the multimodal system model (). Aye khuda mujhko bata mp3 song free download. These theories are basically grounded in neuroanatomy.

Initially, a single system model for emotion (i.e., limbic system theory of emotion) was the most widely accepted early theory of emotion (). However, critics argued that the term “limbic system” does not consistently define specific brain regions. In addition, there are other brain regions (e.g., orbitofrontal cortex and ventromedial prefrontal cortex) that are thought to have critical roles in emotion processing, but are not involved in the limbic system (). The right hemisphere model suggests that there is a strong lateralization of emotion processing toward the right hemisphere. Even though many previous studies have demonstrated that right-side lesions are critical to the processing of emotions (e.g.,; ), this model cannot fully explain emotional recognition deficits in patients with left-side atrophy (e.g., ). Has proposed the multi-system model of emotion, which states that unique patterns of neural mechanisms trigger each emotion. In other words, discrete neural substrates are responsible for specific emotion recognition deficits.

Therefore, it is possible that processes involved in the identification of facial emotions vary based on the content of the emotion (). Previous studies support the multimodal system model (; ). The current study was also performed based on the framework of the multimodal theory. A common and effective approach to understanding human FER is to examine patients who show a deficit in FER.

Patients with frontotemporal dementia (FTD) show changes in interpersonal behaviors such as apathy, social misconduct, and impaired social awareness (; ). FTD is a term encompassing three subtypes of FTD: behavioral variant FTD (bvFTD), semantic dementia, and progressive non-fluent aphasia. FTD classification is performed based on the patients’ dominant clinical symptoms. Patients with bvFTD have disturbances in behaviors, and those with semantic dementia or progressive non-fluent aphasia have fluent or non-fluent disturbances in language. Patients with bvFTD and semantic dementia have deficits in emotional processing (for a review, see ). Patients with frontal or behavioral variants of FTD in particular have deficits in processing fear, anger, disgust, and sadness when compared to healthy controls (), and additionally are impaired in both facial and vocal emotion recognition (; ).

A recent meta-analysis study analyzed 19 studies involving 329 healthy controls (HCs), 162 patients with bvFTD, and 147 patients with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) (). The authors found that patients with bvFTD had significant deficits in both negative and positive FER when compared to HCs.

Furthermore, the effect sizes were larger for negative emotions (e.g., anger = 1.48, disgust = 1.41) than for positive emotions (e.g., happy = 0.60). Patients with bvFTD also had impaired recognition of all emotions except for happiness (i.e., anger, disgust, fear, sadness, and surprise) when compared to those with AD. The effect size was largest for disgust (i.e., 1.05). These results indicate that there are distinct FER deficits depending on both the patient diagnosis and the contents of the emotions. Therefore, specific performances for each emotion and the diagnostic status should be clarified.