Cannondale Super Fatty Headshok Manual Transmission

Quote, originally posted by Shawn O » Someone local is selling this one for $900. That's a Super-V, not Delta V. OP, the first pic is blocked.not sure if are you interested in the full suspension Delta V or hardtail? I'd stay away from the full-suspension. It was one of the first on the market and there's been a significant amount of progress since.

Cannondale has also developed a suspension fork called the Lefty. It started with the 'Headshok' (a.k.a. 'Fatty') forks. It uses 88 needle bearings to reduce friction for smooth travel with the bearings telescoping inside the steerer tube of the fork. Transmission - Patented Cleandrive® Shimano Nexus 3-speed Brakes - Hydraulic disk, front and rear. 1995 Cannondale Super V 1.000 Full Susp XC Single Speed Mtn bike. HeadShok Super Fatty Ultra DL (2005) fork. (80mm / 3.14' travel.).

They really are not very pleasurable to ride. The hardtail's are OK I suppose. Like most older Cannondale's they're damn stout, I think you'd have to try to break/crack one. But they're heavy by current standards, have very little travel which is not very adjustable, and under the wrong circumstances that extra tube up front can lead to the demise of your jubblies.

But if you don't mind the short comings of a mtn bike that age, it might be a cool build up. Quote, originally posted by anti-seize » / then why does it say delta v on the frame? Not trying to argue. Every one of these frame designs I have seen in person had the Delta insignia on it as well. Chess rules in tamil pdf download. Because it's a Delta V.

The Killer V were the higher end rigid tail non-headshock (but usually with suspension forks) with the same V frame introduced in 1994. Lower end bikes also got the v-frame that year. A girlfriend I had in '94 got the M400 14' in the V-frame, but I don't recall it being branded as Delta V, and I'm positive it wasn't branded as Killer V. I'm running on memory here, so I could be totally off. I just did a search and found this: Modified by cvalentine at 9:43 AM 9-4-2008. Quote, originally posted by bcze1 » That's a Super-V, not Delta V.

OP, the first pic is blocked.not sure if are you interested in the full suspension Delta V or hardtail? I'd stay away from the full-suspension. It was one of the first on the market and there's been a significant amount of progress since. They really are not very pleasurable to ride. The hardtail's are OK I suppose. Like most older Cannondale's they're damn stout, I think you'd have to try to break/crack one.

But they're heavy by current standards, have very little travel which is not very adjustable, and under the wrong circumstances that extra tube up front can lead to the demise of your jubblies. But if you don't mind the short comings of a mtn bike that age, it might be a cool build up. Yeah, those are about as efficient as the Trek Y bikes. Quote, originally posted by borapumpkin » sweet bikes.

Those old dales bring back some memories. That's when i started getting into mountain biking. I just have this image in my head of the first time i saw the cannondale raven, it was like $4,000.

Back then, that was A LOT of money for a bike. Now, that's about what you have to spend. I saw a Raven for sale in Bend, OR a few months ago for $900 or so. It was in fantastic shape.if I would've had the money to blow on it, I'd have got it just for a conversation piece.